IIRC, the front of the car is to the right in this diagram, I'm not quite sure anymore. But yes, the numbers coincide with the cylinders, so there is a way in which you can align the diagram with your engine.
Anonymous on 23 Apr : 21:10
Hey Bjoern. I have a question about your wiring diagram on the MAF conversion. Is the diagram of the injector wiring from the top view of the engine? Because I'm guessing the injector numbers don't coinside with the cylinder numbers? Thanks
The auto tranny is a problem, because you have a very limited choice of computers. Unfortunately, I have no idea about auto trannies and can't help you there. Conversion to standard is a big deal and not for the faint of heart. I bought a book on Ford EFI which I found to be very helpful and I learned a lot from it. I think it was this one: [link]
hey bjoern, ive had your maf conversion in my favorites forever... i finally rebuilt the engine, but put in a lumpier cam, along with some other minor mods, so now basically, it runs, but with the old map sensor, not so good. thats alot of technical words, and all ive worked on up to this point is oldies with carbs and no EFI, but im learning alot and im loving it. i have one difference, but i dont think it bothers anything, i have an automatic transmission, so if i install the maf system out of a newer pickup it may want to read the e40d when i just have an aod... unless maybe i can find one with a standard transmission?? i dunno, im getting so confused with all this technology, i would like to do it step by step just as you did. can you help me somehow?
IIRC, the front of the car is to the right in this diagram, I'm not quite sure anymore. But yes, the numbers coincide with the cylinders, so there is a way in which you can align the diagram with your engine.
Anonymous on Wednesday 23 April 2008 - 21:10:47
Hey Bjoern. I have a question about your wiring diagram on the MAF conversion. Is the diagram of the injector wiring from the top view of the engine? Because I'm guessing the injector numbers don't coinside with the cylinder numbers? Thanks
bjoern on Sunday 13 April 2008 - 08:44:50
Awesome, thanks. Just left a comment at the article and will write a short blog post, too.
Anonymous on Sunday 13 April 2008 - 07:47:43
They have a feature to suggest interesting stuff, though it might fit in nicely with the other stories they run.
bjoern on Sunday 13 April 2008 - 07:05:19
Sweet! How'd you get that there?
Matthias W. on Saturday 12 April 2008 - 07:08:54
You should be getting some traffic right now: [link]
Anonymous on Thursday 31 January 2008 - 13:07:38
temperture location
bjoern on Friday 09 November 2007 - 10:44:35
Shoot me an email if there's anything specific I can do for you!
bjoern on Friday 09 November 2007 - 10:43:57
The auto tranny is a problem, because you have a very limited choice of computers. Unfortunately, I have no idea about auto trannies and can't help you there. Conversion to standard is a big deal and not for the faint of heart. I bought a book on Ford EFI which I found to be very helpful and I learned a lot from it. I think it was this one: [link]
lightning_msd on Wednesday 07 November 2007 - 02:56:34
hey bjoern, ive had your maf conversion in my favorites forever... i finally rebuilt the engine, but put in a lumpier cam, along with some other minor mods, so now basically, it runs, but with the old map sensor, not so good. thats alot of technical words, and all ive worked on up to this point is oldies with carbs and no EFI, but im learning alot and im loving it. i have one difference, but i dont think it bothers anything, i have an automatic transmission, so if i install the maf system out of a newer pickup it may want to read the e40d when i just have an aod... unless maybe i can find one with a standard transmission?? i dunno, im getting so confused with all this technology, i would like to do it step by step just as you did. can you help me somehow?
bjoern on Tuesday 31 July 2007 - 07:36:13
I did send you a reply, did you get it?
loveoffly on Friday 27 July 2007 - 14:37:48
Excuse me! Because many foreign websites are forbidden by Chinese government(I donot know wether there is a similar system for filtering email) just check out the arrival of my email ^_^
bjoern on Thursday 26 July 2007 - 11:34:11
Of course! As you can see, I'm currently attending a meeting in Vancouver. Please give me some time, ok?
loveoffly on Thursday 26 July 2007 - 11:22:14
hi,I am the guy interesting in aggressive behavior.I have sent you an email.Would you like to give me some suggestion?
Anonymous on Thursday 26 July 2007 - 03:03:10
k
Howard on Tuesday 19 June 2007 - 02:31:20
I looked into this and it should work fine. Ford programmed the computer to wait for a certain number of crankshaft revolutions before it looks for the exhaust pulse for that cylinder, and that value can be changed, so if the o2 sensor is to far away(like with long tube headers) it will run different. Thanks again, you are a genius!
bjoern on Monday 18 June 2007 - 01:38:21
Splitting doesn't change a thing, since the voltage doesn't change in parallel wires. So the computer actually "sees" two O2 sensors, that's all. It works just the same as with two sensors, only that you can't differentiate between the two banks if something goes wrong (and it may be less sensitive to small changes in one bank only).
Howard on Monday 18 June 2007 - 01:18:28
Ignore the firing order question, I found your schematic, but the O2 sensor split signal is sheer genius if it works for this conversion! There is no work around for the injector firing order except to change the cam(or reprogram the computer), but your way lets you re-pin the computer...I am not sure if splitting the signal makes it run rich or lean...hmm.
howard on Monday 18 June 2007 - 01:01:41
bjoern, I am doing a MAF conversion like you did on your truck, I have 2 questions, what firing order did you wire the injectors for, and how do you think connecting the right and left oxygen sensor inputs together will change the way the computer runs or deals with signal? Great site BTW and thanks!
bjoern on Thursday 17 May 2007 - 07:25:18
Hey, cool to hear from you! This paper was the first one or two slides of my talk. For the rest I'm currently doing more experiments per reviewer request.
Leeanne on Thursday 17 May 2007 - 07:18:26
Hi Bjoern, I met you in Janelia farm in March. I just came across your site and think it's very cool! I will definitley be keeping up with the media frenzie you've created
testing ecaptcha on Sunday 15 April 2007 - 07:33:46
another anti-spam test
bjoern on Wednesday 17 January 2007 - 02:57:05
Cool! Müssen uns unbedingt mal treffen, wenn ich mal zu besuch in Wü bin! Schick' mir doch 'ne mail, dann kann ich Bescheid geben!
Heiko on Monday 15 January 2007 - 03:20:21
doch doch, solange die Knochen halten Aber nur noch unregelmäßig und 2. Mannschaft
bjoern on Friday 12 January 2007 - 07:03:26
Spielst nicht mehr, oder doch?
Heiko on Friday 12 January 2007 - 04:08:19
Wohne mit meiner Familie in Höchberg, bin aber als SAP Berater in ganz Süddeutschland unterwegs, derzeit meist Stuttgart.
bjoern on Friday 12 January 2007 - 01:51:44
Heiko! Ist ja geil! Wo treibst Du Dich denn rum zur Zeit!
sportal colleagues on Thursday 11 January 2007 - 09:59:44
Hi Björn, greatings from old handball colleague and rival from TG HöchbergQ! Heiko
bjoern on Thursday 09 November 2006 - 07:47:20
Check your email - I've sent you an ad for a Canadian position (University of Windsor): [link]
livio on Thursday 09 November 2006 - 07:13:30
Hi Bjoern! Heard of any "neuroethological-oriented" available PhD somewhere at this time? thanks if u can suggest me better than "google". My email is [email]. Tschuss!
bjoern on Thursday 24 April 2008 - 02:06:48
feedburner.com
